Summary:
This commit is a bit of a shotgun fix for various project settings.
Realistically, they could've been separate commits, but this is
convenience for just getting things into a green state to unblock
further work.
Details:
- Use our version of TS in vscode plugins
- organize vscode/settings.json
- fix tsconfig.test and tsconfig.prod (removes errors in test files)
- only use prod tsconfig in webpack
- point .eslintrc to both test and prod configs
- cleanup storybook
- running eslint in my workspace was OOMing. I configured
maxWorkers like we had in v1 to fix this.
- remove .storybook from code coverage
- remove .js files from code coverage --> after moving away
from Next.js, we don't allowJS in our tsconfig anymore. We only
use JS for configurations, it's not allowed in src code!
* refactor(site): match v1 tsconfig
Summary of changes:
* ordered configurations for ease of readability
* allowJs removed -> not needed after Next.js
* noImplicitAny removed -> this is set to true by strict
* strictNullChecks removed -> this is set to true by strict
* removed lingering next-env.d.ts in include
* refactor(site): simplify tsconfig.test.json
Because that the base tsconfig was simplified when changing from
Next.js, this one now duplicates most of it. I still believe having a
separate tsconfig is a good idea for the purposes of separating tests
from source code. It especially can make it easier for eslint and jest
performance.
Fix for #348 - migrate our NextJS project to a pure webpack project w/ a single bundle
- [x] Switch from `next/link` to `react-router-dom`'s link
> This part was easy - just change the import to `import { Link } from "react-router-dom"` and `<Link href={...} />` to `<Link to={...} />`
- [x] Switch from `next/router` to `react-router-dom`'s paradigms (`useNavigation`, `useLocation`, and `useParams`)
> `router.push` can be converted to `navigate(...)` (provided by the `useNavigate` hook)
> `router.replace` can be converted `navigate(..., {replace: true})`
> Query parameters (`const { query } = useRouter`) can be converted to `const query = useParams()`)
- [x] Implement client-side routing with `react-router-dom`
> Parameterized routes in NextJS like `projects/[organization]/[project]` would look like:
> ```
> <Route path="projects">
> <Route path=":organization/:project">
> <Route index element={<ProjectPage />} />
> </Route>
> </Route>
> ```
I've hooked up a `build:analyze` command that spins up a server to show the bundle size:
<img width="1303" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/88213859/157496889-87c5fdcd-fad1-4f2e-b7b6-437aebf99641.png">
The bundle looks OK, but there are some opportunities for improvement - the heavy-weight dependencies, like React, ReactDOM, Material-UI, and lodash could be brought in via a CDN: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50645796/how-to-import-reactjs-material-ui-using-a-cdn-through-webpacks-externals
This refactors the front-end collateral to all live within `site` - so no `package.json` at the root.
The reason we had this initially is that the jest test run and NextJS actually require having _two_ different `tsconfig`s - Next needs `jsx:"preserve"`, while jest needs `jsx:"react"` - we were using `tsconfig`s at different levels at the hierarchy to manage this.
I changed this behavior to still use two different `tsconfig.json`s, which is mandatory - but just side-by-side in `site`.
Once that's fixed, it was easy to move everything into `site`
Follow up from: https://github.com/coder/coder/pull/118#discussion_r796244577
Colin Adler
Bruno Quaresma
Kira Pilot
Oxylibrium
G r e y
Bryan
